ADDICTION

img_1675

 

The cure for addition,

is not prevention.

 

Treating addiction,

a path to liberation.

 

Should people be prevented?

Or should they be liberated?

 

To feel that liberation,

Requires condemnation.

But colder than rejection.

The curtain of prevention.

 

What say we, the veil of corporations?

Pray tell us, dear algorithmmm…sss

Is Nothing Something?

Sometimes, I think, there is nothing I can think, that hasn’t been thought before, given my circumstances.

But then again, my circumstances are unique. As are all of ours.

But now particularly.

From what I can see, and from what I have been taught…much of all our circumstances have occurred within the peripheral of, all or nothing.

But now I think, I straddle existence between all and nothing – seeing both and seeing that, it’s not a certainty that it is all or nothing. There’s a whole lot in between.

And seeing that there is stuff in between, is only the beginning of forever. Because there’s more infinity traveling towards nothing, than trying to maintain the journey that you see.

So I have learned, not from myself but from life itself, that we are bound to be drawn to nothing. To want, to learn, to know, more about what nothing is.

It seems nothing, is the thing, I want to know about.

 

 

‘Even the birds are chained to the sky’

If you want to know how the universe is, watch a starling murmuration.

 

Watching unique parts arrange,

presiding back, where beauty’s from.

And knowing nothing, quite the same,

from unique parts, is chaos born.

 

Undisturbed; appreciation.

 

Observing this, one could relate

one’s own experience.

Unique part, myself creates,

yet still I see the us.

 

And seeing we, and knowing that

to move is not unique.

Unique disturbed, from part to part,

chaotic beauty, lays in between.

Absolute Zero


The point of zero is where time and gravity equal zero. We always travel towards where time is less, assuming this results in ageing less.
But time and age are not the same. Age increases as time decreases. 

So what we must really want, is to gain in age in lesser time. 
When time and mass equal each other –  there’s infinite age and zero time. 
Yet it’s living things that aim to escape zero time, the consequence needing time. 

Infinity is Relative

img_4144

We’ve complicated infinity as a concept, by definitively pointing out that it never ends. Of course it’s so hard to conceive of ‘it’ never ending, when ‘it’ is nothing.

Infinity is a description of a specific unending pattern. Infinity doesn’t have to amount to one unending pattern, combined of all unending patterns. That doesn’t make sense, because that couldn’t amount to a whole unending pattern. Such a situation would actually be finite because at some point, isolated unending patterns would cease interacting with other infinite unending patterns…and so the whole ends.

Do I move or does the World move?

img_4044

Ain’t it weird how I move and the world does not? Or is it that the world moves, and I do not…?

Internal processing of external movement manifests itself in two ways:
External objects that are not fixed to the earths surface (in a stationary/inert way);
external objects that are fixed to the earth’s surface (in a stationary/inert way).
The former relates to other living entities, man-made machines, gases, liquids etc…
The later relates to what we consider the earth’s surface itself. An earthquake is a good example of when our senses, and survival mechanisms are dumbfounded.

But why do we have the ability to comprehend that things are either moving or they are stationary? My deduction is that, what we think of as moving and not moving, is only true to the extent that our internal alerts are triggered, recognising a difference between ourself and external stimuli.

The things that we recognise as moving, become more recognisable relative to the distance observed over a certain period of time, traveling away or towards ourselves.
Therefore the moving things that we are less able to recognise as moving, are the things that move closer to the movement in which we ourselves are moving.

This recognition of external movement is not really movement and non-movement. It is simply all movement that diverges from the speed at which we are traveling.

And doesn’t this prove existence?
It demonstrates that we are travelling at a certain objective speed, controlled by gravity and other forces which are specific to our external environment. These forces have in turn been determined based on the objective agreement that common observable external things, are moving at an agreed rate.

Everything that does move, to our recognition, is rational based on the common truth of ‘ourselves’. This is mathematics (laws of physics, including theoretical physics).

This common truth can only be the mind. The mind is the thing that recognises, even when it itself is still. Our minds are the things that aren’t moving.

The unmoved mover.

Realisation and Distraction (2nd edition)

img_4042

Realisation and distraction,
the curse of one another.
The curse they know because they are,
but equal to each other.

Growth of each, extends the curse,
dilutes the truth they stem from.
But look at what’s diluting them,
the substance extending – its will to diverge.

What misconception this creates –
expansion despite resistance.
Expansion is resistance –
the substance is the curse.

But one is roots and one is fruit,
the fruit is tempting time.
It welcomes its neighbours, seeks to recruit.
While the roots are the ones to dine.

Each stem from common substance,
the roots create fruit in abundance;
must therefore be the same.
The fruit is the roots to gain.

Learning From Mistakes

img_4024

Relates to an objective and, the things that didn’t achieve it.

The objective is not clear but, it certainly is ahead.
Were mistakes, as now believed,
once part of the objective?
So then the certainty of this objective, is certainly part mistake.
Or have I mistaken the objective?
Is this what learning is?

What is learned from each mistake,
does not extinguish learning;
and each mistake and what is learned, exists within that learning.

And what regard we give to learning, composed of each mistake!
Not knowing where we’re going,
except only that we’re learning.

So learning is ahead of us,
made
clearer
by
mistakes.

 

The Role of Time in the Concept of Something and Nothing


Time is a measure of change, but it has many dimensions:

1. My living time – the things that change within my current surroundings;
2. Collective (human) learned time – a structured accepted measure of living time. This can also be applied retrospectively to past times (from human, earth perspective);
3. Observation of a time that has occurred in the past, in the present living time.

Understanding that an observed past event is not happening in our living time demonstrates the following:

1. Time is a human construct, which enables us to rationalise our existence as separate from being an essence of time;
2. Living and past time can occur at the same time when observed by reason;
3. To know that you exist in the living time and also accept the observable past time must mean that existence is different from time;
4. This breaks down the generally posited idea that change = time and that this rule applies universally and relatively. How can we exist and be subject to the natural laws of the universe, while at the same time also observe the past?

This creates a loophole in relativity. This loophole is actually a revelation of the fact that it doesn’t work to apply our standard measure of living time, to the past and to the future – because living measurement of time changes as the composition of our environment changes…relativity!!

So of course we cannot conceptualise a time when there was nothing, however we can conceptualise a time when we did not know that a past event had occurred, even though it had. We just did not have the tools to recognise it, nor the ability to translate it into our relative understanding of ‘living’ time.

We think of no time, as ‘nothing’, but isn’t that the same as the past event that did occur that we have not observed yet?

The difference between something and nothing is not time and no time, but human recognition of a change in matter, whenever identified.

This solidifies my understanding that time is not the measure of something from nothing, nor the product of something…it is the evidence that something is just a view, restricted by time, of everything. Everything being both something and nothing.